Leadership Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Leadership - Assignment ExampleGroups and Teams The requirement for this heading stipulates brief from ones knowledge of gatheringing dynamics and performance, to provide an explanation why this sub-section may be ineffective. The course module focusing on lesson 3 free radicals and teams distinguish between an effective and ineffective group by indicating that effective groups are able to grow through each stage of development, whereas ineffective groups throne get stuck in the forming, norming or storming stages (Lesson 3, 5). From the bill of members composing the sub-section, it can be clearly deduced that these members have non been formed together meaning, their membership in the sub-section occurs at different points in time. One member, Rhea Nordheimer, the calculating machine programmer, has been with the section for 10 years, while Jasmine Sangrinas appointment as an RMS clerk is her first posting and comparatively new. The supervisor, Pierre Dalicaster, is also an old-timer, having had 30 years experience in the service. The differences in entry point to the group has been a crucial factor in contributing to diversity in personal and professional goals that at last lead to missing tasks and project deadlines. As such, the problems manifested express inefficiencies in the performing state, apparently burdened with distractions or dysfunctional interpersonal conflict (Lesson 3, 5) and dysfunctional personal and professional goals. Further the performing factors composition, size, group norms and ropiness define differences in crucial elements that influence the groups effectiveness and ability to achieve organizational goals. The composition of the members itself indicate diversity in ages (Dalicaster about to retire, Sangrina newly graduate), status, interests, and personal goals. Concurrently, there is the issue of cohesiveness where it is eminent that members do not want to stay together (as James Cockingham expressed that he would rather be fanny in this previous regiment) and there is a lack of interest for interaction and interpersonal relationships (Cockingham does not interact with other members of the sub-section Nordheimer is not a warm or approachable person and openly dislikes Cookster or Cockingham Sangrina is loth to ask for help and Delicaster not trained for the position). All of these factors validate the sub-sections ineffectiveness as a group. Decision-making To address the need to select a decision-making approach and to provide an explanation how one could employment it to station possible problems and potential solutions for this sub-sections ineffectiveness, one proposes the military approach where both rational and behavioral approaches (Lesson 1, 7). The scenario indicates that in the capacity of a Section Head, one has been governing operations of the section in a cross of only one month, therefore it would be more viable to use the military approach to use the five-model under rational d ecision approach, in conjunction with behavioral approach, using the information on observation noted in the scenario. The group decision making process where the sub-section supervisor, Delicaster would meet with the group to discuss group problems and to solicit feedback and participation